Outline:
1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.
I will start the introduction by delivering a famous saying that told by a authoritative linguist Noam Chomsky: Language is a process of free creation. And next, naturally I will talk about the current English education system in Korea and I will show some negative aspects of it. Then, as thesis statement, " English education in Korea should experience changes for the students' capacity to write in English." will be written.
2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.
In the first part of the narration, I will suggest a current circumstances that made me produce such an argument. ( The result of experiment that is conducted by EF, the biggest English education company) Then, I will summarizes relevant materials that searched before.
3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.
I will write the confirmation part roughly like this. First, people have studied English only to get good score in the college entrance test. Second, some Korean education hinders students' creativity. Third, parents and language instructor tend to focus on the superficial result. More in details, i will use Krashen's theory for the first reason. And next, i will suggest the correlation between the average amount of reading books and writing. (-Think) In third reason, I will show readers how perfectionism affects in writing.
4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.
I will concede that the basic reason why Korean students are struggling with English composition is because we are not native speaker. However, i will explain this situation completely different with what they thoughts. With the invested money for English education in Korea in mind, the opponent can not say like it is a natural thing.
5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.
I will insist again that English education in Korea should be experienced some changes for the students' capacity to write in English. Next, i will summarize the contents of the confirmation part. And not just a summary, i will show the implications and the synergy effects after my argument is accepted.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기